https://www.journal.linguaculture.ro/index.php/home/issue/feed Linguaculture 2026-01-14T10:34:29+02:00 The Editorial Board journal@linguaculture.ro Open Journal Systems <div style="text-align: left;"> <p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="responsive" style="float: right; padding: 5px 5px 0px 5px;" src="https://journal.linguaculture.ro/public/site/images/scbn21/cover-2010-mic.png" alt="" width="210" height="277" />LINGUACULTURE is a peer-reviewed academic journal run by the Linguaculture Centre for (Inter)cultural and (Inter)lingual Research affiliated to the Department of English at the Faculty of Letters,<strong> Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași</strong>, Romania.</p> <div>Focus: <strong>Anglistics</strong></div> <div>Working language: <strong>English</strong></div> <div>Areas of interest: <strong>(comparative) linguistics</strong>, <strong>literary theory and criticism</strong>, <strong>cultural anthropology</strong>, <strong>discourse studies</strong>, <strong>translation studies</strong>, <strong>theatre and film studies</strong>, <strong>language learning and teaching</strong>, etc. </div> <div> </div> <div>Publisher: <a href="https://www.editura.uaic.ro/"><strong>Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press</strong></a></div> <div>Frequency: 2 issues per year, published in June and December</div> <div>Online ISSN:<strong> 2285-9403 | </strong>Print ISSN:<strong> 2067-9696 </strong></div> <div> </div> <div style="color: red;"><strong>Registered users are kindly asked to check their SPAM folder for our messages. </strong></div> </div> https://www.journal.linguaculture.ro/index.php/home/article/view/441 How to (Re)discipline Literature through a Cultural Studies Lens 2026-01-14T10:34:29+02:00 Dragoș Ivana <p>Starting from Valentine Cunningham’s dichotomy between “good reading” (107), i.e. the ideology-free reading of the literary text, and “bad reading” (88), that is, reading theory against the textual grain, this article aims to discuss the lures and ruses of cultural studies, once applied to the study of literature. I shall focus on the literature-cultural studies dyad, which in the past four decades has led to a revision of academic curricula and the literary canon and, most importantly, to the socio-political understanding of literature as <em>text</em> <em>in context</em>. Special attention will be paid to the lack of consensus on cultural studies as a well-established discipline: while some scholars and critics take the discipline as a means whereby literary study can mirror different ideologies, power relations, hegemony, social practices and humanity in general, others vilify cultural studies because it makes literary studies impure. As I argue, literature can be read through a cultural studies lens as long as their knowledge and methods of analysis are duly appropriated and employed by their practitioners.</p> 2025-12-31T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Dragoș Ivana https://www.journal.linguaculture.ro/index.php/home/article/view/440 The English Bard and French Theory 2026-01-14T10:28:09+02:00 Adrian Papahagi <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This essay revisits the question of Shakespeare’s contemporaneity in light of the interpretive frameworks that have dominated the last half-century of literary criticism. Beginning with Jan Kott’s assertion that Shakespeare is “our contemporary,” I examine how the Frankfurt School and “French Theory” reshaped Shakespearean studies through Marxist, feminist, queer, postcolonial, and ecocritical lenses. While acknowledging some of the insights these approaches have brought, I also express scepticism toward their ideological excesses, which often obscure Shakespeare’s artistry and meaning. Drawing on examples from the sonnets, </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Romeo and Juliet</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">, </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Othello</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">, </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Tempest</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and other plays, I argue for a return to historical-philological methods and for the cultivation of aesthetic wonder in the study of literature. In an age dominated by radical theory, daring to affirm the banality that Shakespeare was a great artist, not a social fighter or a fierce representative of “patriarchy” may itself be a radical act.</span></p> 2025-12-31T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Adrian Papahagi