How to (Re)discipline Literature through a Cultural Studies Lens
Main Article Content
Abstract
Starting from Valentine Cunningham’s dichotomy between “good reading” (107), i.e. the ideology-free reading of the literary text, and “bad reading” (88), that is, reading theory against the textual grain, this article aims to discuss the lures and ruses of cultural studies, once applied to the study of literature. I shall focus on the literature-cultural studies dyad, which in the past four decades has led to a revision of academic curricula and the literary canon and, most importantly, to the socio-political understanding of literature as text in context. Special attention will be paid to the lack of consensus on cultural studies as a well-established discipline: while some scholars and critics take the discipline as a means whereby literary study can mirror different ideologies, power relations, hegemony, social practices and humanity in general, others vilify cultural studies because it makes literary studies impure. As I argue, literature can be read through a cultural studies lens as long as their knowledge and methods of analysis are duly appropriated and employed by their practitioners.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation)”. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. Monthly Review Press, 1971. pp. 79-87.
Bennett, Tony. Formalism and Marxism. Methuen, 1979.
Bérubé, Michael. “Cultural Studies and Cultural Capital”. Employment of English: Theory, Jobs, and the Future of Literary Studies. New York UP, 1998. pp. 4-36.
Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. Harcourt Brace & Company, 1994.
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Trans. Susan Emanuel. Stanford UP, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503622522.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria. Ed. Adam Roberts. Edinburgh UP, 2014.
Culler, Jonathan. Literary Theory. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford UP, 2000.
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell, 1983.
---. The Event of Literature. Yale UP, 2012. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300171365.001.0001.
Easthope, Antony. Literary into Cultural Studies. Routledge, 1991.
Eco, Umberto, editor. On Ugliness. Rizzoli, 2007.
Felski, Rita. “The Role of Aesthetics in Cultural Studies”. The Aesthetics of Cultural Studies. Ed. Michael Bérubé. Blackwell, 2005. pp. 28-43.
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard UP, 1980.
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books, 1972.
Hebdige, Dick. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. Routledge, 1979. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780203139943.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment (1790). Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Hackett Publishing Company, 1987.
Leavis, F. R. The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad. Chatto and Windus, 1948.
---. Mass Civilisation and Minority Culture. Cambridge: Gordon Fraser, 1930.
Eaton, Marcia. “Kantian and Contextual Beauty”. Beauty Matters. Ed. Brand Peggy. Indiana U P, 2000. pp. 27-36.
Miller, Hillis J. Thomas Hardy: Distance and Desire. Belknap Press of U of Harvard P, 1970.
Shklovsky, Victor. “Art as Technique”. Modern Criticism and Theory. A Reader. Ed. David Lodge. Longman, 1988. pp. 16-30.